KARAKTERISTIK MAGNETIC LOOP PROBE  POLIGONAL  SEBAGAI APLIKASI PENGUKURAN NEAR FIELD

Haryo Dwi Prananto; Priyo Wibowo; Tyas Ari Wahyu Wijanarko; Wuwus Ardiatna; R. Harry Arjadi

doi:10.24176/simet.v11i1.3941

KARAKTERISTIK MAGNETIC LOOP PROBE POLIGONAL SEBAGAI APLIKASI PENGUKURAN NEAR FIELD

Haryo Dwi Prananto - [ https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3953-6163 ]
Priyo Wibowo
Tyas Ari Wahyu Wijanarko
Wuwus Ardiatna
R. Harry Arjadi

Abstract

Pada pengujian kompatibilitas elektromagnetik khususnya pada pengukuran near field, pengukuran medan magnet sangat diperlukan. Salah satu alat pengukuran yang digunakan adalah magnetic loop probe. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk membandingkan loop probe pada jumlah sisi geometrinya, dan belum ada referensi yang membahas tentang topik ini. Magnetic loop probe didesain dalam tujuh bentuk geometri yaitu bentuk segi 3 (ada dua model), segi 4, segi 6, segi 8, segi 10, dan segi tak hingga (lingkaran) dimana parameter keliling geometrinya sama. Magnetic loop probe didesain dengan menggunakan perhitungan sebagai small loop antenna Karateristik kelima desain probe dianalisis dengan mengukur S₂₁ sebagai sensitivitas menggunakan Vector Network Analyzer. Karateristik bentuk probe maupun gain dan sensitivitasnya dibahas dalam makalah ini.

Keywords

magnetic loop probe; keliling geometri; sensitivitas

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

H. W. OTT, Electromagnetic Compatibility Engineering. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2009.

N. Sivaraman, F. Ndagijimana, M. Kadi, and Z. Riah, “Broad band PCB probes for near field measurements,” in Proc. of the 2017 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE 2017, 2017, pp. 4–8.

R. Kobayashi, T. Kobayashi, C. Miyazaki, N. Oka, and H. Oh-hashi, “Near Magnetic Field Probe for Detection of Noise Current Flowing to Uncertain Directions,” in Proc. of the 2017 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE 2017, 2017, pp. 6–10.

S. Shinde, S. Marathe, G. Li, and D. Pommerenke, “A Frequency Tunable High Sensitivity H-Field Probe Using Varactor Diodes and Parasitic Inductance,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 58, no. February, 2015.

Z. Yan, J. Wang, W. Zhang, Y. Wang, and J. Fan, “A Simple Miniature Ultra-wideband Magnetic Field Probe Design for Magnetic Near-field Measurements,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 64, no. 12, 2016.

M. Lin, C. He, C. G. Hsu, and A. P. Structure, “Study of Magnetic Probes Used in EMI Measurements,” in 2015 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2015, pp. 399–401.

S. Lin, S. Yen, W. Chen, and P. Cheng, “Printed Magnetic Field Probe with Enhanced Performances,” in 2009 Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, 2009, no. 840, pp. 649–652.

N. Sivaraman, “Design of magnetic probes for near-field measurements and the development of algorithms for the prediction of EMC,” Université Grenoble Alpes, 2017.

Z. You, C. Xiao, H. Wang, and Z. Yaozhong, “The Calculation of the Magnetic Field Produced by an Arbitrary Shaped Current-carrying Wire in Its Plane,” in Proceedings of the 2012 2nd International Conference on Computer and Information Application (ICCIA 2012), 2012.

H. J. Visser, Antenna Theory and Applications. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2012.

C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory Analysis and Design, 3rd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2005.

T. Harada, H. Sasaki, and E. Hankui, “Time-Domain Magnetic Field Waveform Measurement Near Printed Circuit Boards,” Electr. Eng. Jpn., vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 9–18, 1998.

Y. Chou, S. Member, and H. Lu, “Magnetic Near-Field Probes With High-Pass and Notch Filters for Electric Field Suppression,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 2460–2470, 2013.

E. Suzuki, S. Arakawa, H. Ota, K. I. Arai, and R. Sato, “Optical Magnetic Field Probe Working up to 15 GHz Using CdTe Electrooptic Crystals,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 344–351, 2005.

J. P. Silva and A. J. Silvestre, “Comparing a current-carrying circular wire with polygons of equal perimeter: Magnetic field versus magnetic flux,” Eur. J. Phys., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. p783-790.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24176/simet.v11i1.3941