RIP VS. OSPF ROUTING PROTOCOLS: WHICH ONE IS THE BEST FOR A REAL-TIME COMPUTER NETWORK?

Nuur Wachid Abdul Majid; Syifaul Fuada

doi:10.24176/simet.v11i1.3796

RIP VS. OSPF ROUTING PROTOCOLS: WHICH ONE IS THE BEST FOR A REAL-TIME COMPUTER NETWORK?

Nuur Wachid Abdul Majid
Syifaul Fuada

Abstract

The development of modern computer networks for internet access makes routing protocols needed, and it has an essential role in a real-time system. Therefore, the best and most effective routes can be reached. In this short article, we discuss the comparison of two popular routing protocols, i.e., Routing Information Protocol (RIP) and Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) using two network simulators, i.e., Graphical Network Simulator-3 (GNS3) and Enterprise Network Simulation Platform (ENSP). Both of OSPF and RIP routing protocols can be used in the same topology and have differences in the connection time required to connect communication between routers. Thru GNS3 and ENSP, we obtained the comparison result at ideal condition; we found that the OSPF routing protocol (83 ms) has a faster time or efficient in connection than RIP (177 ms). Besides, we found that compared to GNS3 network simulators (329 ms), the ENSP has a relatively more rapid average time (94 ms). This work suggests that a Huawei router with ENSP is faster than a Cisco router which is used by GNS3. Hopefully, this information can be refereed by internet network administrators to build real-time computer networks.

Keywords

routing protocol; RIP; OSPF; ENSP; GNS3; real-time computer network

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Akhtar M N Ali A Ali Z Hashmi M A and Atif M, 2018 Cluster based routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: an overview Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 9, 12 p. 389–396.

Sarkohaki F Fotohi R and Ashrafian V, 2017 An efficient routing protocol in mobile ad-hoc networks by using artificial immune system Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 8, 4.

Purnomo M F E Andari D Y S and Pramono S H, 2013 Simulasi Kinerja Routing Protokol Open Shortest Path First (Ospf) Dan Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (Eigrp) Menggunakan Simulator Jaringan Opnet Modeler V. 14.5 urnal Mhs. Tek. Elektro Univ. Brawijaya 1, 2 p. 1–6.

Chou T-S Baker S K and Vega-Herrera M, 2016 A Comparison of Network Simulation and Emulation Virtualization Tools in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Balyk A Karpinski M Naglik A Shangytbayeva G and Romanets I, 2014 Using Graphic Network Simulator 3 for DDOS Attacks Simulation Int. J. Comput. 16, 4 p. 219–225.

Jayakumar M Rekha N R S and Bharathi B, 2015 A comparative study on RIP and OSPF protocols in 2015 International Conference on Innovations in Information, Embedded and Communication Systems (ICIIECS), Coimbatore p. 1–5.

A S and Rana W J, 2013 Performance Analysis of RIP and OSPF in Network Using OPNET Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues 10, 6 p. 256–265.

Habib M . Shehu H A and Bello I, 2018 Performance Analysis of EIGRP and OSPF Routing Protocols for a Client Network Int. J. Adv. Acad. Res. 4, 7 p. 46–56.

Krishnan Y N and Shobha G, 2013 Performance Analysis of OSPF and EIGRP Routing PRotocols for Greener Internetworking in International Conference on Green High Performance Computing (ICGHPC) p. 1–4.

Masruroh S U Robby F and Hakiem N, 2016 Performance evaluation of routing protocols RIPng, OSPFv3, and EIGRP in an IPv6 network in International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) p. 111–116.

Circiumarescu L D Predusca G Angelescu N and Puchianu D, 2015 Comparative Analysis of Protocol RIP, OSPF, RIGRP and IGRP for Service Video Conferencing, E-mail, FTP, HTTP in 20th International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science p. 584–589.

Sabirin F and Permana R, 2017 Perbedaan routing menggunakan routing information protocol (RIP) dengan Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Cybernetics 1, 2 p. 120–130.

Techdifferences, 2017, Difference between RIP and OSPF.

Dumitrache C G Predusca G Circiumarescu L D Angelescu N and Puchianu D C, 2017 Comparative study of RIP, OSPF, and EIGRP prototols using Cisco packet tracker in 5th International Symposium on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ISEEE) p. 1–6.

Ajani A A Ojuolape B J Ahmed A A Aduragba T and Balogun M, 2017 Comparative performance evaluation of open shortest path first, OSPF and routing information protocol, RIP in network link failure and recovery cases in IEEE 3rd International Conference on Electro-Technology for National Development (NIGERCON) p. 280–288.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24176/simet.v11i1.3796