Hubungan Berpikir Komputasi dan Pemecahan Masalah Polya pada Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar

Ajeng Rara Veronica; Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono; Wiryanto Wiryanto

doi:10.24176/anargya.v5i1.7977

Hubungan Berpikir Komputasi dan Pemecahan Masalah Polya pada Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar

Ajeng Rara Veronica
Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono
Wiryanto Wiryanto

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between computational thinking and Polya's problem-solving in mathematics learning. This research is a library research study. The research stages consist of collecting data through books, national journals, and international journals, reducing data, presenting data, and making conclusions. This study is important to do because computational thinking and problem-solving are skills that are very crucial and needed in the era of society 5.0. Both abilities are very important to be developed in learning mathematics, especially in elementary school. Even so, there is little attention to developing computational thinking skills in mathematics learning. Computational thinking and Polya's problem-solving are two interrelated things. In computational thinking, problem understanding occurs in abstraction, decomposition, algorithmic thinking, evaluation, and generalization. The problem-solving planning process occurs in abstraction and decomposition. The implementation of the solution plan occurs in algorithmic thinking and evaluation. Meanwhile, a re-examination occurs in the evaluation and generalization aspects.

Keywords

Computational Thinking; Problem-Solving; Mathematics Learning.

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Aho, A. 2012. Computation and Computational Thinking. The Computer Journal, 56(7), 832–835.

Ansori, M. 2020. Penilaian Kemampuan Computational Thinking. SALIMIYA: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Keagamaan Islam, Vol. 1, No. 2, 176-193.

Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. 2011. Bringing Computational Thinking to K-12: What is Involved and What is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community? Inroads, 2(1), 48–54.

Bilbao, J., Bravo, E., Garcia, O., Varela, C., & Rebollar, C. 2017. Assessment of Computational Thinking Notions in Secondary School. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 5(4), 391–397.

Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education – Implications for Policy and Practice. doi:10.2791/792158: EUR 28295 EN.

Bundy, A. 2007. Computational Thinking is Pervasive. Journal of Scientific and Practical Computing 1, No. 2, 67–69.

Bungin, B. 2015. Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Corradini, I., Lodi, M., & Nardelli, E. 2017. Conceptions and Misconceptions about Computational Thinking among Italian Primary School Teachers. Proceedings of ICER ’17, (hal. 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3105726.3106194). Tacoma, WA, USA, August 18-20.

Csizmadia, A., Curzon, P., Dorling, M., Humphreys, S., Ng, T., Selby, C., et al. 2015. Computational Thinking - A Guide for Teachers. Swindon: Computing at School 18pp.

CSTA, & ISTE. 2011. Operational Definition of Computational Thinking for K-12 Education. Retrieved from https://id.iste.org/docs/ct-documents/computational-thinking-operationaldefinition-flyer.pdf

Durak, H., & Saritepeci, M. 2018. Analysis of the Relation Between Computational Thinking Skills and Various Variables with the Structural Equation Model. Computers in Education, 116, 191–202.

Effandi, Z. 2007. Trend Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Kuala Lumpur: PRIN-AD, SDN, BHD.

Mufidah, I. (2018). Profil Berpikir Komputasi Dalam Menyelesaikan Bebras Task Ditinjau Dari Kecerdasan Logis Matematis Siswa. Skripsi Tidak Diterbitkan. Surabaya: Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

OECD. 2019. “PISA 2018 Questionnaire Framework” in PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/850d0ef8-en.

Pei, C., Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. 2018. Cultivating Computational Thinking Practices and Mathematical Habits of Mind in Lattice Land. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20 (1), 75-89. DOI: 10.1080/10986065.2018.1403543.

Qualls, J. A., & Sherrell, L. B. 2010. Why Computational Thinking Should be Integrated into the Curriculum. J. Comput. Sci. Colleges 25, 66-71.

Riley, D., & Hunt, K. 2014. Computational Thinking for the Modern Problem Solver. Boca Raton: CR Press.

Rich, K. M., Yadav, A., & Larimore, R. A. 2020. Teacher Implementation Profiles for Integrating Computational Thinking Into Elementary Mathematics and Science Instruction. Education and Information Technologies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10115-5.

Rich, K. M., Yadav, A., & Schwartz, C. V. 2019. Computational Thinking, Mathematics, and Science: Elementary Teachers’ Perspectives on Integration. Jl. of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(2), 165-205.

Rijke, W. J., Bollen, L., Eysink, T. H., & Tolboom, J. L. 2018. Computational Thinking in Primary School: An Examination of Abstraction and Decomposition n Different Age Groups. Informatics in Education, Vol. 17, No. 1, 77-92. DOI: 10.15388/infedu.2018.05.

Rohman, N., Toyib, M., & Sutarni, S. 2020. Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Model TIMSS Konten Bilangan pada Siswa dengan Kecerdasan Logis-Matematis Rendah dan Sedang. Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya (KNPMP) V (hal. 102-113). Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Selby, C. C., & Woollard, J. 2013. Computational Thinking: The Developing Definition. 18th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. Canterbury.

Sengupta, P., Kinebrew, J., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. 2013. Integrating Computational Thinking with K-12 Science Education Using Agent-Based Computation: A Theoretical Framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18(2), 351–380.

Setyawan, D., & Rahma, A. 2013. Eksplorasi Proses Konstruksi Pengetahuan Matematika Berdasarkan Gaya Berpikir. Jurnal Sainsmat, II, 140–152.

Siswono, T. Y. 2008. Model Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pengajuan Dan Pemecahan Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif. Unesa University Press.

Syah, M. 1999. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu.

Tsai, C. W., Shen, P. D., Tsai, M. C., & Chen, W. Y. 2017. Exploring the Effects of Web-Mediated Computational Thinking on Developing Students’ Computing Skills in a Ubiquitous Learning Environment. Interactive Learning Environments 25, No. 6, 762–777.

Veronica, A. R., & Wiryanto. 2020. Kreativitas Siswa Sekolah Dasar Berkecerdasan Numerik dalam Memecahkan Soal Eksplorasi Geometri Ditinjau Berdasarkan Gender. JPGSD, 121-130.

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., et al. 2016. Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms. J Sci Educ Technol, DOI 10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5.

Wing, J. M. 2006. Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM – Self Managed Systems, 49(3), 33-35.

Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. 2016. Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms. TechTrends, DOI 10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7.

Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. 2014. Computational Thinking in Elementary and Secondary Teacher Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, Vol. 14, No. 1, Article 5, OI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2576872.

Yunus, M. & Mitrohardjono, M. 2020. Pengembangan Teknologi di Era Industri 4.0 dalam Pengelolaan Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar Islam Plus Baitul Maal. Jurnal Tahdzibi: Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, Vol. 3, No. 2. 129-138.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24176/anargya.v5i1.7977