Umpan Balik Sistem Pakar Sebagai Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT. Multistrada Arah Sarana, Tbk

Eneng Iviq Hairo Rahayu, Suhardoyo, Iwan

Abstract


In this study the researcher described the expert system-based feedback as performance assessment for the employees at PT Multistrada Arah Sarana, Tbk. By using descriptive qualitative research, purposive sampling technique is used in this research to determine the people who will be used as resource persons. The data analysis technique used in this study is the interactive model. The variables used in this study were feedback and performance assessment
One important factor is giving feedback or review in the production process. The aim is to keep the production process running well and smoothly to produce number of targeted items to meet market needs. Evidence-based performance management relies on feedback that relies on facts rather than opinions. Giving the type of feedback must be tailored to the needs of employees. Employee needs are related to the level of psychosocial development of employees.
Feedback can be delivered by the competent facilitator so that recipients of feedback can find out their strengths and weaknesses. Using the feedback employee can then set future goals and improvement targets so that their leadership performance becomes more effective. In order to record feedback and follow up on the implementation of objectives that have been made related to the feedback provided, it is better if the manager of the talent management program provides a book that specifically records the track record of the participants


Keywords


feedback; performance assessment; expert system-based feedback

References


Apruebo, Roxel A. (2005). Sport pshicology. Manila: UST Publishing House

Armstrong, Michael. (2009). Armstrong’s Handbook of Performance Management. 4th edition. Kogan Page. London

Bing-You RG, Paterson J, Levine MA. (1997). Feedback falling on deaf ears: residents’ receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Medical Teacher.

Bungin, B. (2007). Analysis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.

Colleti LM. (2000). Difficulty with negative feedback: face to face evaluation of Junior medical student clinical kinerjance results in grade inflation. Journal of Surgical Research.

Herlina I.S. Wungouw & Diana V. Doda. (2012). Peran Umpan Balik Bagi Mahasiswa Kedokteran. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado Sulawesi Utara

Hesketh E.A, & Laidlaw J.M. (2002). Developing the instinct: feedback. Medical Teacher.

Lee, I. (2005). Ennhancing the effectiveness off Teacher Feedback in the secondary writing classroom”. Chinese University of Hongkong

Miles, M.B & Huberman, A.M (1994). Qualitative & Analysis, 2th ed.USA: Sage Publication.

Moleong Lexy J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda karya

Rink, Judit E. (1985) Teaching Phisycal Education for Learning. ST. Louis Time Mirror/Mosby.

Suherman, Adang. (1998). Umpan Balik, Strategi Belajar Mengajar Pendidikan Jasmani dan Kesehatan

Suharyadi dan Purwanto (2009). Statistika untuk ekonomi dan keuangan Modern, edisi 2 buku 2. Jakarta: Salemba Empat

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24176/bmaj.v2i1.3211

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 378| PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) views : 1924

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


free hit counter View My Stats

Member of

Index by:

 

   

Flag Counter


Business Management Analysis Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Dedicated to: